Getting messier with TIDieR: embracing context and complexity in intervention reporting
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|30 May 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Naoimh McMahon|
|25 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Garry Tew|
|25 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Sarah Cotterill|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|25 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Naoimh McMahon|
|12 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Garry Tew|
|23 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Sarah Cotterill|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Dec 2017||Editorially accepted|
|18 Jan 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12874-017-0461-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.