Skip to main content

Table 5 The 90th percentile confidence intervals for all performance measure estimates of each method for Scenario 4 in Table 1 (corresponding to Fig. 4)

From: Outlier classification performance of risk adjustment methods when profiling multiple providers

Measure

H

L R F

L R R

g P S A

g P S W

g P S WT

g P S MWS

Sensitivity

1

0.20, 0.70

0.00, 0.20

0.00, 0.20

0.00, 0.20

0.00, 0.10

0.00, 0.20

 

2

0.50, 0.90

0.00, 0.30

0.00, 0.30

0.00, 0.20

0.00, 0.20

0.00, 0.20

 

3

0.80, 1.00

0.10, 0.40

0.10, 0.40

0.00, 0.30

0.00, 0.30

0.00, 0.30

 

4

0.90, 1.00

0.20, 0.50

0.20, 0.50

0.00, 0.30

0.00, 0.40

0.00, 0.40

Specificity

1

0.57, 0.82

0.95, 1.00

0.95, 1.00

0.92, 1.00

0.92, 1.00

0.90, 0.97

 

2

0.57, 0.80

0.98, 1.00

0.98, 1.00

0.92, 1.00

0.95, 1.00

0.90, 1.00

 

3

0.57, 0.82

0.97, 1.00

0.97, 1.00

0.95, 1.00

0.95, 1.00

0.92, 1.00

 

4

0.55, 0.80

1.00, 1.00

1.00, 1.00

0.95, 1.00

0.97, 1.00

0.95, 1.00

PPV

1

0.11, 0.41

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 0.50

 

2

0.27, 0.53

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

 

3

0.33, 0.56

0.75, 1.00

0.75, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

 

4

0.36, 0.56

1.00, 1.00

1.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.33, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

NPV

1

0.76, 0.90

0.79, 0.83

0.79, 0.83

0.79, 0.83

0.79, 0.82

0.78, 0.83

 

2

0.84, 0.97

0.80, 0.85

0.80, 0.85

0.79, 0.83

0.79, 0.83

0.79, 0.83

 

3

0.92, 1.00

0.81, 0.87

0.82, 0.87

0.79, 0.85

0.80, 0.85

0.79, 0.85

 

4

0.96, 1.00

0.83, 0.89

0.83, 0.89

0.80, 0.85

0.80, 0.87

0.79, 0.87

  1. H = factor by which the outlier distributions were shifted; PPV = positive predictive value; NPV = negative predictive value