Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of response rates on invitation mode of a web-based survey on influenza vaccine adverse events among healthcare workers: a pilot study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Sep 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Claire Keeble
24 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Glenn Israel
19 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Xiaochen Tai
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Claire Keeble
29 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Glenn Israel
17 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Xiaochen Tai
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Jun 2018 Author responded Author comments - Xiaochen Tai
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Jun 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
13 Jun 2018 Editorially accepted
20 Jun 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12874-018-0524-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement