Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Systematic mapping of existing tools to appraise methodological strengths and limitations of qualitative research: first stage in the development of the CAMELOT tool

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Dec 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Craig Lockwood
3 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catrin Evans
15 Nov 2018 Author responded Author comments - Heather Munthe-Kaas
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Nov 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catrin Evans
3 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Craig Lockwood
8 Mar 2019 Author responded Author comments - Heather Munthe-Kaas
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Mar 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Apr 2019 Author responded Author comments - Heather Munthe-Kaas
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Apr 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
9 Apr 2019 Editorially accepted
4 Jun 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12874-019-0728-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement