Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Preventing bias from selective non-response in population-based survey studies: findings from a Monte Carlo simulation study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Oct 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Kristin Gustavson
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jacques-Emmanuel GALIMARD
1 Mar 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Zeynep Kalaylioglu
2 Apr 2019 Author responded Author comments - Kristin Gustavson
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Apr 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jacques-Emmanuel GALIMARD
24 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Zeynep Kalaylioglu
15 May 2019 Author responded Author comments - Kristin Gustavson
Resubmission - Version 4
15 May 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
17 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jacques-Emmanuel GALIMARD
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
21 May 2019 Editorially accepted
13 Jun 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12874-019-0757-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement