Facilitating validation of prediction models: a comparison of manual and semi-automated validation using registry-based data of breast cancer patients in the Netherlands
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|20 Dec 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|24 Jan 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Adrian Bickerstaffe|
|8 Apr 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2|
|23 Apr 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Cornelia van Steenbeek|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Apr 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Apr 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Adrian Bickerstaffe|
|3 May 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2|
|23 May 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Cornelia van Steenbeek|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 May 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 May 2019||Editorially accepted|
|8 Jun 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12874-019-0761-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.