Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Facilitating validation of prediction models: a comparison of manual and semi-automated validation using registry-based data of breast cancer patients in the Netherlands

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Dec 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adrian Bickerstaffe
8 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
23 Apr 2019 Author responded Author comments - Cornelia van Steenbeek
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Apr 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adrian Bickerstaffe
3 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
23 May 2019 Author responded Author comments - Cornelia van Steenbeek
Resubmission - Version 3
23 May 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
28 May 2019 Editorially accepted
8 Jun 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12874-019-0761-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement