Consolidated criteria for strengthening reporting of health research involving indigenous peoples: the CONSIDER statement
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|12 May 2019||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Jul 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hendrik van den Bussche|
|21 Jul 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alipasha Meysamie|
|30 Jul 2019||Author responded||Author comments - tania huria|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Jul 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Aug 2019||Author responded||Author comments - tania huria|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Aug 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Aug 2019||Editorially accepted|
|9 Aug 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12874-019-0815-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.