Skip to main content

Table 1 Review of statistical analysis methods [22,23,24,25,26,27]

From: Statistical reanalysis of vascular event outcomes in primary and secondary vascular prevention trials

Analysis method

Outcome type

Statistical assumptions

Advantages

Disadvantages

Binary logistic regression (BLR)

Binary

• No assumptions made about explanatory variables

• Can adjust for covariates

• Large number of observations required

Cox proportional hazards (CPH)

Binary

• Proportionality of hazards over time

• Censoring of observations is unrelated to prognosis

• Can adjust for covariates

• If assumptions of the model not met then subsequent analyses and risk estimates will possibly be biased

Chi-square (χ2) (CS)

Binary and ordered categorical

• Chi-Square – Total count is > 40 or total count is 20–40 and the expected value of each exposure-outcome category is > 5

• Simple to implement

• Cannot adjust for covariates

Cochran-Armitage trend test (CAT)

Ordered categorical

• Similar to the Chi-square test but it takes into account the ordering across categories

• Easy to interpret

• Cannot adjust for covariates

Ordinal logistic regression (OLR)

Ordered categorical

• Response is ordinal

• Proportionality of odds

• Can adjust for covariates

• If assumptions of the model not met then subsequent analyses and odds estimates will possibly be biased

Mann-Whitney U test (MWU)

Ordered categorical

• Non-parametric test

• Response is ordinal / continuous

• Observations from both groups are independent of one another

• Easy to interpret

• Cannot adjust for covariates – there are extensions of this method, which allow for adjustment [28,29,30]

Median test (MT)

Ordered categorical

• Non-parametric test

• Considers the position of each observation relative to the overall median.

• Easy to interpret

• Cannot adjust for covariates

• Inefficient (low power) to detect differences if sample size is large.

t-test

Continuous (used on the ordered categorical)

• Response is continuous

• Homogeneity of variances

• Easy to interpret

• Cannot adjust for covariates

Multiple linear regression (MLR)

Continuous (used on the ordered categorical)

• Response is continuous

• Linear relationship

• Homogeneity of variances

• No or little multicollinearity

• Can adjust for covariates

• Assumes linear relationship

• Sensitive to outliers

Win Ratio testWins/losses version (WR)

Combination of binary outcomes

• Responses for each outcome are binary

• Accounts for clinical priorities of endpoints

• Prioritises the more major component of the outcome

• Useful for composite outcomes

• Extensions of this approach allow for covariate adjustment [31]

• Easy to interpret

• New method

• Doesn’t use the precise times from randomisation to event occurrence

Bootstrapping

(BS)

Ordered categorical

• None

• No assumptions made about the distribution of the data

• Cannot adjust for covariates

• Computationally intensive

• Doesn’t provide a meaningful point estimate