Peer Review reports
From: Abstracts in high profile journals often fail to report harm
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
30 Jul 2007 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
21 Sep 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - ENRIQUE BERNAL-DELGADO |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
21 Sep 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
4 Nov 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sheena Derry |
13 Dec 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sally Hopewell |
15 Dec 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Moher |
18 Dec 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anne-Marie Bagnall |
11 Jan 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - ENRIQUE BERNAL-DELGADO |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
11 Jan 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
17 Jan 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - ENRIQUE BERNAL-DELGADO |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
17 Jan 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
28 Jan 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sheena Derry |
29 Jan 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sally Hopewell |
31 Jan 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anne-Marie Bagnall |
9 Feb 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Moher |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
3 Mar 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - ENRIQUE BERNAL-DELGADO |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
3 Mar 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
27 Mar 2008 | Editorially accepted | |
27 Mar 2008 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-8-14 |
You can find further information about peer review here.