Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Abstracts in high profile journals often fail to report harm

Original Submission
30 Jul 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Sep 2007 Author responded Author comments - ENRIQUE BERNAL-DELGADO
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Sep 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sheena Derry
13 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sally Hopewell
15 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Moher
18 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne-Marie Bagnall
11 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - ENRIQUE BERNAL-DELGADO
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
17 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - ENRIQUE BERNAL-DELGADO
Resubmission - Version 5
17 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
28 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sheena Derry
29 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sally Hopewell
31 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne-Marie Bagnall
9 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Moher
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
3 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - ENRIQUE BERNAL-DELGADO
Resubmission - Version 8
3 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
27 Mar 2008 Editorially accepted
27 Mar 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-8-14

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page