Skip to main content


Fig. 4 | BMC Medical Research Methodology

Fig. 4

From: On the use of propensity scores in case of rare exposure

Fig. 4

Effect of strength of confounding. Bias of exposure effect, variability ratio, 1 - coverage and RMSE according to strength of confounding and mean sample size, for one continuous and one dichotomous confounder, σ B,C =0, H R=1, r c =50 % and p=5 %, with weighting by inverse of PS using ATE and ATT weights and PS-matching

Back to article page