|
While researcher is putting together the research proposal
|
Researcher fully understanding which data have been collected, study design etc.
|
Possibility for Researchers to raise questions directly regarding data collected on the data sharing company sites.
|
Higher number of research proposals needing to be rejected or resubmitted following initial review.
|
|
During research to clarify understanding of study’s SAP, dataset specifications
|
Enable the Researcher to understand data and the analysis already conducted.
|
Ensure complete documentation is provided by data holder to eliminate this as much as possible
|
Lack of knowledge of data collected potentially leading to inappropriate analysis.
|
|
Sharing the completed analysis, interpretation and proposed publications
|
Sponsor is aware prior to publication of any difference in interpretation of results
|
Sponsor requests to be informed up front of publication. The alternative is to take a risk and deal with receiving information in parallel to it being in public domain
|
Differing results based on analyses of anonymized data could lead to different interpretation and raise either justifiable or unnecessary concerns in scientific and public domains
|
