Table 3 Best method with respect to sensitivity, precision and kappa for each combination of intensity and type of error
Sensitivity | ||||||||
| Â | Type a | Type b | Type c | ALL | ||||
SD | Method | Sensitivity | Method | Sensitivity | Method | Sensitivity | Method | Sensitivity |
0.5 | MMOM | 7.66% | MMOM | 11.22% | MMOM | 11.17% | MMOM | 8.87% |
1 | MMOM | 16.46% | MMOM | 22.41% | MMOM | 21.88% | MMOM | 15.02% |
2 | MMOM | 53.78% | MMOM | 56.84% | SMOM | 44.89% | MMOM | 39.83% |
3 | MMOM | 85.08% | SMOM | 84.24% | SMOM | 62.27% | MMOM | 62.77% |
4 | MMOM | 97.49% | SMOM | 95.64% | SMOM | 71.58% | MMOM | 70.08% |
5 | MMOM | 99.08% | SMOM | 99.68% | SMOM | 79.22% | SMOM | 78.09% |
Precision | ||||||||
| Â | Type a | Type b | Type c | ALL | ||||
SD | Method | Precision | Method | Precision | Method | Precision | Method | Precision |
0.5 | mBIV | 17.29% | mBIV | 25.13% | mBIV | 18.15% | sBIV | 35.00% |
1 | mBIV | 32.21% | mBIV | 52.02% | mBIV | 75.18% | mBIV | 85.77% |
2 | mBIV | 86.19% | mBIV | 93.42% | mBIV | 94.10% | mBIV | 96.78% |
3 | mBIV | 95.71% | mBIV | 97.83% | mBIV | 97.26% | mBIV | 98.52% |
4 | mBIV | 97.89% | mBIV | 99.00% | mBIV | 98.49% | mBIV | 99.29% |
5 | mBIV | 98.94% | mBIV | 99.44% | mBIV | 99.05% | mBIV | 99.58% |
Kappa | ||||||||
| Â | Type a | Type b | Type c | ALL | ||||
SD | Method | Kappa | Method | Kappa | Method | Kappa | Method | Kappa |
0.5 | MMOM | 0.032371 | MMOM | 0.077747 | MMOM | 0.077343 | MMOM | 0.00075066 |
1 | MMOM | 0.110746 | MMOM | 0.199737 | MMOM | 0.193746 | MMOM | 0.17241 |
2 | MMOM | 0.406851 | MMOM | 0.530886 | SMOM | 0.43264 | MMOM | 0.391957 |
3 | MMOM | 0.676109 | SMOM | 0.767761 | SMOM | 0.621228 | SMOM | 0.550216 |
4 | SMOM | 0.751824 | SMOM | 0.879063 | SMOM | 0.728476 | SMOM | 0.659092 |
5 | SMOM | 0.866256 | sBIV | 0.967156 | SMOM | 0.810343 | sBIV | 0.767412 |